Skinner v. Lucas
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants Lucas and Bennett bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The plaintiff brought this suit in the character •of receiver of the Michigan Mutual Fire Insurance Company, averring in the declaration that he had been duly appointed as such receiver.
The action is based upon an alleged bond or undertaking for costs.
The averments of the declaration are, substantially, that ■on the thirteenth day of April, 1885, defendant Mansfield exhibited his petition to the circuit court for the county of Kent, in chancery, in a certain cause therein pending, wherein Eugene Pringle, as Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Michigan, was complainant, and the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Skinner v. WilhelmMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Burton v. SchildbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Brion v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Scott v. DuncombeNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pontiac Trust Co. v. NewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Goodenough v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Oakland County Prosecutor v. BeckwithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Oakland County Prosecutor v. BeckwithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.