Burton v. Schildbach
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit. Foreclosure. Bill dismissed without prejudice.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The Legislature of 1869 passed an act to authorize the incorporation of Building and Savings Associations, which is published as chapter 93 of the Compiled Laws of 1871. Several associations were formed under and in supposed conformity with its provisions; and among them the “Detroit Building & Savings Association No. 4,” of which the defendant William Schildbach became a member. The articles of association provided for a capital stock of $250,000, divided into 2000 shares, of which no member could hold more than twenty. The shares were to be had on paying an initiation fee of ten cents, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mok v. Detroit Building & Savings Ass'n No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Mechanics' & Working-Men's Mutual Savings Bank & Building Ass'n v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Parmelee v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Chesnut v. Shane's LesseeOhio Supreme Court · 1847
- Thompson v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
3Cited by7 opinions
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Cunningham v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Calkins v. BumpMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Building & Loan Ass'n v. ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Skinner v. LucasMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.