Legal Opinion

Consolidated Railway Electric Lighting & Equipment Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 1, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On demurrer to amended bill. '

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The general object of this bill is the specific performance of an agreement for the assignment of patents or inventions, and it is filed bjr the assignee of the original purchaser against one *286of the original vendors, and also the assignee of this vendor or assignor. The agreement in writing (a copy of which is annexed to the amended bill) is dated July 31st, 189-1, and by it Morris Moskowitz, Leon D. Adler and Abraham S. Adler, as the owners of certain inventions and improvements, for some of which patents had been allowed, after reciting that the National Electric Car Lighting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bates Machine Co. v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Birkery Manufacturing Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. CheshireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Republic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. MoskovitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. A. B. Dick Co. v. FullerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API