Legal Opinion

Bates Machine Co. v. Bates

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. R. W. Hilscher, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The appellant company filed its bill in chancery in the circuit court of Will county, against the appellees, for a decree commanding the appellees to assign to the appellant company a certain patent for a woven wire fence, and a certain other patent for a machine to weave such woven wire fence. The appellees, defendants to the bill, filed answers thereto, and the appellee the Consolidated Steel and Wire Company filed its cross-bill against the Bates Machine Company, as the sole defendant, setting up its claim that it was the owner of the patents for the wire fence and for the machine to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joliet Manufacturing Co. v. DiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Stonega Coal & Coke Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Hall v. GruesenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  5. A. B. Dick Co. v. FullerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API