Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1992No. 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for an accounting arising from the administration of a decedent’s estate. Maxie Johnson died intestate in March, 1982. His heirs at law were his widow, Letha M. Johnson, and his two sons, Malcolm K. Johnson and Ansel J. Johnson. Malcolm Johnson later died testate, leaving his widow, Emodene Davis Johnson, as the sole beneficiary under his will. In June, 1988, Letha Johnson commenced this action for an accounting against Emodene Johnson and Ansel Johnson. At the same time, Letha Johnson and Ansel Johnson brought an action against Emodene Johnson for partition of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State ex rel. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. Testing Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Jones & Parker v. WebbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raby Construction, L.L.P. v. OrrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Real Estate Pros, P.C. v. ByarsWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Saro Investments v. Ocean Holiday PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Pocisk v. SEA COAST CONSTRUCTION OF BEAUFORTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API