Legal Opinion
Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 10, 1949No. Civ. A. 891PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
The nature of this suit was indicated in a previous opinion upon objections -to interrogatories. See Cinema Amusements v. Loew’s, Inc., et al., D.C.Del., 1947, 7 F.R.D. 318. Subsequent thereto both parties have made certain motions. Plaintiff has moved under Rule 15(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to serve ■and file a supplemental complaint. Defendants have moved under Rule 30(b) to vacate or modify a notice of the talcing of certain depositions made by plaintiff.
Subsequent to the above motions but prior to their disposition by the court,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Headrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Glickenhaus v. Lytton Financial CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Redmond v. Atlantic Coast Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.