Legal Opinion

Phalen v. BIRMINGHAM RACING COM'N

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1985No. 84-840, 84-861 and 84-921PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These appeals and cross-appeal involve the question of the constitutionality of an act of the legislature which authorizes horse racing in the City of Birmingham.

The trial court, after reviewing the law, the briefs, and joint exhibits, and without taking any testimony, entered the following decree:

FINAL JUDGMENT

"This proceeding in Quo Warranto seeks to prevent the exercise of corporate powers by The Birmingham Racing Commission (the `Commission') and also seeks a declaratory judgment that Act No. 84-131 of the 1984 Regular Session of the Legislature of Alabama (the `Act') is unconstitutional.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Richards v. IzziSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. City of Birmingham v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Deputy Sheriffs Law Enforc. v. Mobile Cty.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Bassett v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ellis v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API