Hoskin v. Long Island Loan & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the- Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, J.:
On January 27, 1896, Magdalena E. Schmadeke (who has since married and is‘the plaintiff Magdalena E. Hoskin) gave to defendant the sum of $25,000, and in connection therewith executed and delivered an instrument in writing by which she declared that defendant was : “ To hold and preserve the said principal sum for and during the natural life of the party of the first part (the said plaintiff), investing and reinvesting the said principal sum upon first-class securities and not in speculative stocks or enterprises, and after deducting its commissions for receiving this trust fund and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graff v. . BonnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Townshend v. . FrommerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Metcalfe v. . Union Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Barbour v. . De ForestNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Cramer v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Sperry v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Franklin v. Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Robinson v. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.