Legal Opinion

Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1914PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

On the 29th day of December, 1902, the plaintiff as party of the first part and the Van Norden Trust Company as party of the second part, executed an agreement in writing, under seal and duly acknowledged, whereby the plaintiff assigned and transferred to the trust company certain securities consisting of railroad bonds and certain capital stock of the aggregate par value of $21,000, upon trust to hold the securities and any securities into which they might be converted as a trust fund subject to trusts to pay the net income to the plaintiff, or to apply the same to her use, so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schenck v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. National Park Bank v. BillingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. The National Park Bank of New York v. . BillingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hoskin v. Long Island Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Sperry v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. McKnight v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. In re GallagherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  5. McKenna v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API