Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Woodstock Electric Membership Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1970No. 47PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

G.S. 62-110.2 was enacted in 1965. Prior to its enactment, electric membership cooperatives, such as Woodstock, and investor-owned public utility companies, such as VEPCO, were free to compete in the rural portions of this State, in the absence of contractual restrictions upon such right, irrespective of the fact that such com petition resulted in substantial duplication of power lines and facilities. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership. Corp., 275 N.C. 250, 166 S.E. 2d 663; Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Power Co., 258 N.C. 278, 128 S.E. 2d 405; Pitt & Greene…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Champion Papers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API