Jensvold v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HILTON, Justice.
Action on a limited accident insurance policy to recover damages for the loss of the sight of an eye. The defendant appeals from an order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The policy was written by the Southern Surety Company and later assigned to and assumed by the defendant here. Among other things it insured plaintiff against:
“The effects resulting exclusively of all other causes from bodily injury sustained by the insured during the life of this policy, solely through external, violent and accidental means,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peoples M. Accident Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Tracey v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Olesen v. NorenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Watkins v. United States Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Midland Glass & Paint Co. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Georgia Life & Health Insurance v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Jensvold v. Minnesota Commercial Men's Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934