Little v. Gallus

This action is not to enforce the specific performance of a contract entered into between the litigants, or to restrain the violation of such a contract. The court correctly found, in its second finding of fact, that the rights which the plaintiff sought to have established and enforced did not rest in contract, but arose out of a violation of duty having its origin in the relation of employer and employé, which once existed, when the defendants were infants, but! was some years ago terminated by the plaintiff. We think the injunction relief granted by the final judgment is too indefinite and…