State v. Jaques
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentPorter, Justice
As a court of law we are bound to apply to the case before us the applicable statutory law of this state, and the precedent established by previous decisions of this court. Where neither statute nor our own precedent supply the answer, we may seek guidance from the words and reasoning of the courts of other jurisdictions and the text writers, but these are not binding precedent. We are obligated to fashion our own precedent to apply to the facts. We seek the precedent which best accords with reason and justice under the circumstances presented.
The testimony at issue here was not given by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- State ex rel. Prchal v. DaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Dorman v. Crooks State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.