Legal Opinion

United States v. Lowery

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 27, 1984No. ACM 24212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

In United States v. Charles, 15 M.J. 509 (A.F.C.M.R.1982), we held that a commander may not attempt to improperly influence a prospective defense witness, and to do so is wrong and indefensible. In the case, sub judice, appellate counsel argue that it is equally improper for those in the accused’s chain of command to question a defense witness after he has testified in an attempt to dissuade him from testifying in like cases in the future. They consider this to be an insidious practice that undermines the integrity of the military justice system. They suggest that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RodriguezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. CharlesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HudsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. SerinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. TuckerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API