Legal Opinion
United States of America, and Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Atlantic Richfield Company, United States of America, and Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Atlantic Richfield Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1980No. 77-3234Published
1Opinion of the Court
612 F.2d 1132
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
and
Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 77-3234, 77-3972.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 4, 1980.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1980.
Dirk D. Snel, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-intervenor-appellant.
Richard O. Gantz, Anchorage, Alaska, Avrum M. Gross, Juneau, Alaska,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Doyon, Ltd. v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1977
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Edwardsen v. MortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.