Legal Opinion
Doyon, Ltd. v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1978No. Nos. 76-3658, 76-3681 to 76-3685, 76-3710, 76-3754, 76-3748, 77-1166 and 77-1084PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Appellees Doyon, Ltd. and Bering Straits Native Corporations, together with the eleven corporate appellants,1 constitute the *493Alaska Native Regional Corporations (Regional Corporations) created pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (ANCSA). Corporate appellants and the Secretaries of the Interior and the Treasury2 appeal from a district court Memorandum and Order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees. We reverse.
ANCSA’s primary purpose is to provide a “fair and just settlement of all claims by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Patagonia Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Omar Stratman v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Seldovia Native Ass'n v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Omar StratmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.