United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Appellants protest the ruling of the district court that their trespass claims were extinguished by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Appellants1 represent all the Eskimos on the North Slope of Alaska. Appellees are *1134the State of Alaska2 and companies involved in the effort to exploit North Slope petroleum. Until one or two decades ago the North Slope was essentially unpeopled except for a few Inupiates 3; more recently, there has been a mighty “oil rush.” For the purposes of this appeal, we assume that the Inupiats retained unrecognized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Doyon, Ltd. v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1977
- Edwardsen v. MortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Alaska v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by22 opinions
- Seldovia Native Ass'n v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Inupiat Community of Arctic Slope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kenai Peninsula Borough v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- People of Village of Gambell v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.