Legal Opinion
In Re Playmobil Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1998No. 9:95-cv-02896PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion for class certification in this consolidated consumer antitrust action brought for the enforcement of, and participation in, an alleged vertical price fixing conspiracy between Play-mobil, USA, Inc. (“Playmobil”), a manufacturer of specialty toys, and its alleged co-conspirators, independent retailers, 1 who sell Playmobil products. Plaintiffs seek treble damages on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, for Defendant Play-mobil’s alleged violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. KgaaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.