Legal Opinion

Hixson v. Boren

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1956No. Civ. 5191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.

In the original complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief filed July 30, 1953, hy Joseph R. Hixson et al., including William Lee Farris and Helen Sue Farris, it is alleged that, in a representative capacity, they represent several war veterans who had formed a protective committee to test the validity of several hundred promissory notes ranging from $130 to $150 each, which were signed by such veterans as a secret side agreement over and above the agreed purchase price of the home that each was purchasing under a loan guaranteed by the United States government (Service Men’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Andrews v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Sweeney v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. C. Wattenbarger & Sons v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. J & J Builders Supply v. CaffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API