Legal Opinion
In re C. P. D.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1976No. 10783PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge:
In a fact-finding hearing conducted in the Juvenile Branch of the Family Division of the Superior Court, appellant was found to have been involved in the commission of second-degree burglary, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-1801 (b), and petit larceny, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2202. Appellant argued below that an inculpatory statement he made while in police custody should have been ruled inadmissible, and he renews this contention on appeal. After careful consideration of the entire record before us, we affirm.
On June 1, 1975, appellant, then 11 years old, was arrested by Detective…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- William H. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- United States v. James Bernett, Also Known as James BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- In re Manuel R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. BracyNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re C. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.