Legal Opinion

People v. Bracy

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph A. Mazur, J.

This is a hearing to suppress the confession of the defendants on the ground that the defendants have been denied due process of law. A confession or admission or statement of the defendant is admissible only if its voluntariness is established by the People beyond a reasonable doubt.

The basic question before the court is whether a police officer who is a relative of a defendant can act as a relative or acts only in his official capacity as a police officer.

A thorough review of all the pertinent authorities would *347indicate that the issue here involved is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. People v. HormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. TardiffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. Weatherly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. People v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AlaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. FappianoNew York Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API