Legal Opinion

Mark Henry Lankford v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho State Correctional Institution

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2006No. 99-99015PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

In this pre-AEDPA case, we are called upon to review counsel’s performance in a twenty-two year old capital murder trial. Finding that the record is clear that counsel requested critical jury instructions that were correct under federal law but clearly in error under Idaho law and that the error was not harmless, we reverse the judgment of the district court and grant the writ.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Robert and Cheryl Bravence were reported missing when they failed to arrive at a relative’s house following an extended camping trip in the summer of 1983. One week later,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Scott Felix v. Michael HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Trevino v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API