Legal Opinion
Scott Felix v. Michael Hennessey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2015No. 10-16984UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed on April 28, 2015, is amended by the memorandum disposition filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
No further petitions shall be entertained.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner Scott Emerson Felix appeals from the district court’s denial of his habe-as petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner raises a due process claim premised on errors in his 1998 civil commitment trial under California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act (“SVPA”), Cal. Welf. & Inst.Code §§ 6600-6609.3. The district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Terry Allen Langford v. Rick Day, Acting Administrator of Corrections Division Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. HurtadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Stanley v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Vashon Tyrone Jackson v. California Dept. Of Mental Health John Demorales, Executive Director California Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charles Wayne Jones v. Janine WallaceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025