John Deere Plow Co. v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
1. The first count of the plaintiff’s petition is based on the theory that the defendants displayed the tractor in such a way that it could start of its own motion and run over the plaintiff.
“Upon demurrer, pleadings are to be construed most strongly against the pleader, and in the light of their omissions as well as their averments; and if an inference unfavorable to the right of a party claiming a right under such pleadings may be fairly drawn from the facts stated therein, such inference will prevail in determining the rights of the parties. Krueger v. MacDougald, 148 Ga.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Lewis v. AmorousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Rome Railway & Light Co. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Chalverus v. Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chester v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Johnson v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Norman v. NashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Miles v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Savannah East Side Corp. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.