Miles v. Harrison
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
“A person who intrusts another with a dangerous instrument or article, under such circumstances that he has reason to know that it is likely to produce injury, is liable for the natural consequences of his act.” 65 CJS 949, Negligence, § 69. Succinctly stated, the petition in this case against defendant Miles is predicated on the theory that Miles is liable for the consequences of his act in knowingly permitting the use of his rotary lawn mower by another under foreseeable conditions whereby the mower while so being used was a dangerous instrumentality likely to produce…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith, Pew Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Hines v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- STOVALL & COMPANY, INC. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Hill v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Miles v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967