Legal Opinion

Madison Equities, Inc. v. Robert L. Crockarell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2017No. A16-769PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MCKEIG, Justice.

Appellant Madison Equities, Inc.' sued respondent Robert Crockarell for repayment of a long-overdue promissory note. Crockarell later initiated a separate action against Madison Equities and other parties alleging, among other things, that Madison Equities sued Crockarell on the note to interfere with his business interests. The district court granted summary judgment to Madison Equities on the note claim, but ordered a stay of entry of judgment pending mediation in Crockarell’s later-filed action. Madison Equities petitioned for a writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Bergman v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Duane Charles Hippe, Jr. v. Dakota County Sheriff Joe LekoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  4. Protege Biomedical, LLC v. Duff & Phelps Securities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API