Hudson Trust Co. v. Boyd
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to open final decree, vacate enrollment and dismiss complainant’s bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
This is an orderly foreclosure suit in which for want of appearance and answer by defendants a decree pro confesso and final decree was made and filed July I9th, 1912. The proceedings have been enrolled.
Complainant’s solicitors have sent to the clerk an order to open the final decree, vacate the enrollment and dismiss the bill, “without costs and without prejudice,” and it has been presented to me for signature. The “without costs,” of course, means without costs against the complainant, because upon its application the clerk has already taxed a bill of costs in favor of…
2Cited by19 opinions
- In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Colonial B. L. Assn. v. Mongiello Bros., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Tr., Public Sch. v. the Ott BrewerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Brown v. National State Bank (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Jackson v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Coleman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.