Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bird

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1991No. 71A03-9101-CV-27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

After John Marshall as seller brought an action on a contract to purchase real estate against Lois I. Bird and Chris and Becky Baker, he was granted a default judgment. Later, he filed for proceedings supplemental. In response, Bird filed a TR. 60 Motion for relief from judgment by either granting a partial satisfaction of judgment or granting a setoff equal to the value of the real estate repossessed by Marshall. 1 Bird's motion was granted. Marshall appeals raising these five issues:

I. Whether the trial court erred in ordering a setoff against the judgment.

II. Whether the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fairrow v. FairrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Indiana Tri-City Plaza Bowl, Inc. v. Estate of GlueckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Indiana Insurance Co. v. Sentry Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Arlington State Bank v. ColvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coplay Cement Co. v. Willis & Paul GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Coplay Cement Company, Inc. v. Willis & Paul GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. City of Carmel v. Leeper Electric Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Mid-West Federal Savings Bank v. EppersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Grubnich v. RennerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API