Legal Opinion

Fairrow v. Fairrow

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1990No. 49S02-9009-CV-585PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Joe B. Fairrow petitioned under Ind. Trial Rule 60(B)(8) for termination of a child support order after Joe discovered conclusive medical evidence that he could not be the child's father. We hold that the trial court should have granted him relief.

The divorce of Joe B. Fairrow from Mary E. Fairrow became final on February 7, 1975. The dissolution decree identified Joseph D. Fairrow, born June 7, 1974, as a child of the marriage and ordered Joe to pay child support. Joe testified that he had no reason to question Joseph's paternity at the time of the divorce.

At birth,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Soft Water Utilities, Inc. v. Le FevreIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. R. D. S. v. S. L. S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Pilgrim v. PilgrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Toller v. TollerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Levin v. LevinIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Russell v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API