Glanden v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Christopher Glanden v. State of Maryland, Nos. 1114, 1871, 1872, & 1873, September Term, 2019. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES – IN GENERAL – PLAIN VIEW FROM LAWFUL VANTAGE POINT Suppression court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to suppress drugs found on his person, where the drugs were in plain view of a police officer. At the time the drugs were found, the officer was in a lawful vantage point, the incriminating character of the drugs was immediately apparent, and the officer had a lawful right of access to the drugs. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES – OFFENSES – DEFENSES – MEDICAL NECESSITY OR…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wengert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Williams v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025