Legal Opinion

Glanden v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 2021No. 1114/19PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Christopher Glanden v. State of Maryland, Nos. 1114, 1871, 1872, & 1873, September Term, 2019. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES – IN GENERAL – PLAIN VIEW FROM LAWFUL VANTAGE POINT Suppression court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to suppress drugs found on his person, where the drugs were in plain view of a police officer. At the time the drugs were found, the officer was in a lawful vantage point, the incriminating character of the drugs was immediately apparent, and the officer had a lawful right of access to the drugs. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES – OFFENSES – DEFENSES – MEDICAL NECESSITY OR…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wengert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Williams v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API