Legal Opinion

United States v. Various Gambling Devices

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided December 27, 1973No. GC 71-29 to GC 71-34, GC 71-22 to GC 71-25, GC 71-37 and GC 71-38PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

READY, Chief Judge.

In these consolidated cases, the United States, plaintiff seeks the forfeiture of 435 pinball and slot machines named as defendants under the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1177 on the ground that they are gambling devices within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1171, which were used or possessed during the calendar year 1970 by persons engaged in the business of repairing, reconditioning, buying, selling, leasing, using or making available for use by others gambling devices without having first registered with the Attorney General as required by 15 U. S.C. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. 294 Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHinesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania Video Operators v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. United States v. Sixteen Electronic Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1984
  5. Sun Design Video v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API