Legal Opinion
United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHines
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 14, 1984No. C83-2670PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On June 27, 1983, plaintiff, the United States of America, filed a complaint in forfeiture against one hundred thirty-seven (137) draw poker-type machines and six (6) slot machines. The government contends that these machines are gambling devices as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1171 and subject to forfeiture to the United States under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1172, 1173(a)(3), and 1177. The case is currently before the court on the government’s motion for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion is granted.
On or about…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. One 1978 Chevrolet Impala Vin 1l69u8s156817Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. 294 Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Pullin v. Louisiana State Racing Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- MISSISSIPPI GAMING COM'N v. HensonMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Two (2) Quarter Fall MacHinesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.