Legal Opinion

County of Tulare v. Fenn

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1920No. Civ. No. 2937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. J. A. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In December, 1917, while the defendant was acting as a magistrate of the county of Tulare under and by virtue of his office as recorder of the city of Lindsay in that county (said city of Lindsay being a city of the sixth class), he received a complaint in writing made to him as such magistrate, charging one Ah Wong with the commission of a felony. Such proceedings were had that said magistrate received from the said Ah Wong the sum of five hundred dollars as bail and undertaking that the said Ah Wong would appear, etc., as required. At the time set for the examination of Ah Wong before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CrespiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
  2. Newman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. In re CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API