People v. Reifenstuhl
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for violating subdivision 2, section 337a of the Penal Code and from the order denying her motion for a new trial. Said subdivision makes it a felony for any person to keep or occupy a room or enclosure of any kind with books or paraphernalia for the purpose of recording bets upon the results of horse races. The bases of her appeal are as follows: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) the officer’s telephonic conversation in the room occupied by defendant with an unknown party was erroneously admitted; (3) the court should have accepted the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. PatelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Courtney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.