Legal Opinion

People v. Reifenstuhl

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1940No. Crim. 3281PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for violating subdivision 2, section 337a of the Penal Code and from the order denying her motion for a new trial. Said subdivision makes it a felony for any person to keep or occupy a room or enclosure of any kind with books or paraphernalia for the purpose of recording bets upon the results of horse races. The bases of her appeal are as follows: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) the officer’s telephonic conversation in the room occupied by defendant with an unknown party was erroneously admitted; (3) the court should have accepted the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. People v. PatelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Courtney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API