Legal Opinion

Wise v. Kuehne Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

Appellee, Arthur E. Wise, as plaintiff, instituted a suit against Kuehne Manufacturing Company, a corporation, appellant, as defendant, for damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff when an automobile in which he was riding collided with the rear end of a truck of appellant, operated by one of appellant’s servants and standing on the north or right half of the pavement in a public highway in the nighttime.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of ■ plaintiff against defendant for $3,033, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. The defendant has taken this appeal from the judgment.

Th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Carroll v. KrauseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Miller v. BurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. Eckels v. MuttschallIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People Ex Rel. Fix v. Trustees of Northwestern CollegeIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McKee v. ChaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chapman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. Duncan v. Wiseman Baking CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Budds v. Keeshin Motor Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Hann v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API