Legal Opinion

Hann v. Brooks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1947No. Gen. No. 10,106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

The plaintiff, Willie Bee Hann, administratrix of the estate of Melvin Hann, deceased, filed this suit in the circuit court of La Salle county, Illinois under the Injuries Act against the defendants, Baymond Brooks and Bamsford Huston.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants for $10,000, and defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and motion for a new trial were overruled and judgment entered on the verdict. Both defendants have appealed from the judgment.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that the defendant Raymond Brooks was driving an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Krieger v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Peters v. PetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hanson v. Trust Co. of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Heineman v. HermannIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Sherman v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Fritz v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Rogers v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Luker v. Contract Steel Carriers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API