Heath v. Philpot
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
In section 3 of the act approved August 21, 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 149; Park’s Code (1914), § 6090(a); Michie’s Code, § 6092(1)), it is declared: “Where the judge has finally passed on the merits of a motion for a new trial, and the parties have raised no question as to the sufficiency of the 'approval of the grounds of such motion, or of the approval of the brief of evidence, or of the filing of such motion or brief, or of the jurisdiction of the judge to entertain the motion at the time he did, if the parties acquiesced in his entertaining it at that time, no question as to these matters shall…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Garraux v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Shumate v. RyanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Goodwyn v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Turner v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Marks v. Maxwell Bros. Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Heath v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Thomas v. HubertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951