Stanford v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to recover certain taxes, paid under protest, upon certain stocks and bonds situated in Few York city. Defendant had judgment on the demurrer to the complaint, from which this appeal is prosecuted. It appears from the complaint that at his death plaintiff’s testator was the owner of a large number of stocks or shares and certain bonds of foreign corporations, all of which, except certain described shares of stock, were on and prior to the first Monday in March, 1894, in the state of Few York, and pledged as collateral security for the payment of a loan, “and were not on and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Catlin v. HullSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- People, Ex Rel. Jefferson v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Goldgart v. People ex rel. GoarIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Mackay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- MacKay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bellows Falls Power Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Rankin v. HarringtonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Canfield v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lowry v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.