Hoch v. Hoch
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtArthur W. Lonschein, J.
This is an action to recover a sum of money allegedly ¡unpaid and due pursuant to a judgment of divorce entered in the State of Nevada. That judgment, in awarding ¡support and maintenance to the plaintiff herein pro*654vided, inter alia, that the Nevada court retained jurisdiction over all matters concerning her support.
The defendant does not deny that he failed to make the required payments pursuant to the decree, but moves for judgment on two grounds: first, that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter because the Nevada court reserved to itself jurisdiction over all matters ”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re the Accounting of RhinelanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Van Horn v. Van HornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Rossi v. RossiNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tannenberg v. BeldockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979