Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bynum v. Magno

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2004No. 25834Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

MOON, C. J., in Which LEVINSON, J., Joins.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that a Medicare and/or Medicaid beneficiary may recover medical expenses that he or she, pursuant to federal law, was not legally obligated to pay. The majority’s conclusion improperly, unnecessarily, and lightly disregards this jurisdiction’s long standing formulation and treatment of special damages. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.

In its first certified question, the district court essentially asks whether the amount paid by Medicare and/or Medicaid — as opposed to the amount charged…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API