Legal Opinion
Verrilli v. Damilowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 22, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant Walter DamilowsM and his wife for damages for personal injuries which resulted from being bitten by a dog alleged to have been owned and kept by the defendants. Upon his wife’s death the defendant Walter, as administrator of her estate, was substituted for her as defendant. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover of him individually $2000, and in favor of him as administrator. He has appealed from the judgment entered against him. We refer to him below as the defendant.
The gist of the complaint is that the defendant owned and kept a dog on his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woolf v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Grissell v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Dorman v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tanga v. TangaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Polmatier v. RussSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kowal v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.