Legal Opinion

Polmatier v. Russ

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 9, 1988No. 12926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether an insane person is liable for an intentional tort. The plaintiff, Dorothy Polmatier, executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Arthur R. Polmatier, brought this action against the defendant, Norman Russ, seeking to recover damages for wrongful death. The state trial referee, exercising the power of the Superior Court, rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from that judgment. We find no error.

The trial court’s memorandum of decision and the record reveal the following undisputed facts. On the afternoon of November…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alteiri v. ColassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Rogers v. DoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Grissell v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  5. McIntyre v. SholtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance v. SchussSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Wagner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Herrle v. Estate of MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Gregory v. CottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API