Legal Opinion
Kowal v. Archibald
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 31, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by a dog owned and kept by the defendants. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict was denied, and the defendants have appealed from the judgment, claiming that the court erred in its charge to the jury.
The plaintiff offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved the following: The plaintiff was walking along the public sidewalk on Ninth .Street in Norwich, carrying a paper bag containing two dresses. A dog owned or kept by the defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Amato v. DesentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Cuneo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Dorman v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Hally v. Hospital of St. RaphaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Miller v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lucier v. Meriden-Wallingford Sand & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Le Mars Mutual Insurance Co. of Iowa v. BonnecroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.