Legal Opinion

McMillian v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 20, 2009No. 26688Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Ervin McMillian 1 filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order denying his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We granted the petition to decide the following question: Was counsel ineffective for advising McMillian that the intent to commit a crime could be inferred from the act of trespassing, such that it would provide a factual basis to support a plea to first-degree burglary? We hold counsel was not ineffective and affirm.

FACTS

McMillian was charged with first-degree burglary as a result of an incident that occurred in Columbia, South Carolina on April…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API