Legal Opinion

Hinson v. USD No. 500

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 24, 2002No. 00-4034-SACPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This employment discrimination and retaliation ease comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, who served as a custodian for U.S.D. # 500, alleges that defendants violated the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12102 et seq (“ADA”), and Kansas common law in his termination from employment. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff concedes that summary judgment is appropriate on his state law claim. (Dk. 52, p. 32). 1

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

A court grants a motion for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Data System International Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  2. Powers v. Tweco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Dragone v. GranzowDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  4. Sutter v. FincherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API