State v. Lockwood

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of the test taken with the Breathalyzer Model 2000. He argues that the chemical analyst who administered the test did not follow the regulations of the Commission for Health Services for sequential breath testing and that the Commission failed to set out the time requirements for sequential breath testing as required by G.S. 20-139.1. We disagree with both of defendant’s arguments.

G.S. 20-139.1 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:(b3) Sequential Breath Test Required. —By…