Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 8217SC1328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

In sentencing the defendant the Fair Sentencing Act was not complied with and this matter is remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing.

Pecuniary gain is inherent in the crime of larceny, which the Legislature no doubt took into account when establishing a presumptive sentence for it, and the court erred in using that fact to increase defendant’s sentence. State v. Huntley, 62 N.C. App. 577, 303 S.E. 2d 330 (1983).

It was also error to use as an aggravating factor that the crimes involved great monetary value, because the only evidence of value that was before the court was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API