Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1984No. 48060PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed. State v. Tate, 637 S.W.2d 67 (Mo.App.1982). Defendant filed this Rule 27.26 motion on March 31, 1983. This motion was denied on November 21,1983-without an evidentia-ry hearing. He appeals, alleging he should have received an evidentiary hearing on his contentions of ineffective assistance of counsel, procurement of his conviction by the state’s knowing use of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Decker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. HuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Coday v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API