McPherson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
To sustain a conviction for a felony, the testimony corroborating that of the accomplice must be sufficient to connect the defendant with the perpetration of the crime and tend to show his participation therein. King v. State, 77 Ga. App. 539 (49 S. E. 2d 196); Crowe v. State, 83 Ga. App. 325 (63 S. E. 2d 682). Slight evidence that a larceny was committed by the defendant and identifying him with it will corroborate the testimony of an accomplice and warrant a conviction. Evans v. State, 78 Ga. 351. It is not essential that the corroborating evidence shall in and of itself…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Crowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Welborn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Breland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Askew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Felix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Nooner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.