City of Tracy v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.—
In 2011, the political branches of our state government decided as a matter of public policy that abuses of the redevelopment law, which constituted an ever-growing drain on state finances, required the dissolution of nearly 400 redevelopment agencies and the winding down of outstanding redevelopment obligations; this resulted in a frantic scurry on the part of “sponsoring entities” 2 (usually cities) and their conjoined former redevelopment agencies to lock up “tax increment” revenues—the share of property taxes to which redevelopment agencies had been entitled before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- City of Bellflower v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Brentwood v. Department of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- City of Grass Valley v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.