Legal Opinion

City of Tracy v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2016No. C077440PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.—

In 2011, the political branches of our state government decided as a matter of public policy that abuses of the redevelopment law, which constituted an ever-growing drain on state finances, required the dissolution of nearly 400 redevelopment agencies and the winding down of outstanding redevelopment obligations; this resulted in a frantic scurry on the part of “sponsoring entities” 2 (usually cities) and their conjoined former redevelopment agencies to lock up “tax increment” revenues—the share of property taxes to which redevelopment agencies had been entitled before the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. City of Bellflower v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. City of Anaheim v. BoslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. City of Anaheim v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. City of Brentwood v. Department of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. City of Grass Valley v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API